Charles Co. Court Records 1754-1755
George Keith Jr. vs. Peter Carrico
Peter Carrico & wife vs. George Keith Sr.
George Keith Sr. vs. Peter Carrico
My thanks to Michael Hait for obtaining the copies from the Archives of Maryland for me.
| Date |
Folio |
Transcription |
||||||||||||||||||
| CHARLES
COUNTY COURT (Court Record) Aug 1754, Liber D 3, fol. 413, MSA C658-39, MdHR 8153; Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, Maryland. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Aug 1754 | 413 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| CHARLES
COUNTY COURT (Court Record) Nov 1754, Liber D 3, ff. 467-468, MSA C658-39, MdHR 8153; Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, Maryland. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Nov 1754 | 467 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 468 |
George Scott his attorney an the
said Peter Carricoe by Jeremiah Chase his attorney Com before to the
Court here that he will not any further Prosecute for the Said George against the said Peter in the plea afsd it is therefore considered by the Court here that the said george take nothing by his Writt afsd but that he and his Pledges of Prosecuting be in mercy &c and the said Peter go thereof without say &c It is Likewise Considered that the said Peter do Recover against the said George One hundred and Seventy Eight Pounds of Tobacco for his Cost and Charges by him about his defense in this Part sustained to the same Peter at his request by the Court here adjudged according to the form force and Effect of the Statute in those Cases late made and Provided and that the same Peter have thereof Execution |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| CHARLES
COUNTY COURT (Court Record) Liber E 3, fol. 139, MSA C658-41, MdHR 8154; Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, Maryland. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| June 1755 |
139 |
Summonses Returned to June Court
1755 (Summons ordered ?????) for George Keith Junr to testify in Peter Carico vs. George Keith Senr. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| CHARLES
COUNTY COURT (Court Record) Liber E 3, ff. 204-206, MSA C658-41, MdHR 8154; Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, Maryland. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| June 1755 |
204 |
Peter Carrico and Margaret his wife of a plea wherefore with force and arms and Soforth he made an assault upon the said Margaret at Charles County afsd and her the said Margaret then and there did beat wound Evally Treat so the he Life was Greatly Despared of and other Enormitees to her the said Margarett then and there to the great damage of Him the said Peter and Margarett and against the Peace and Soforth Peter Carrico and Margarett and Margarett his wife by Jeremiah Chase their attorney Complains that the said George the day of in the year of our Lord one Thousand Seven Hundred & fifty with force and arms an Assault her the said Margarett at Charles County afsd did make and her the said Margaret did then and there beat wound and abuse so that of her life it was Dispared and other oughes (?) of the same Margarett then and there Committed against the Peace of the lord Propryitary That now is; and to the damage of them the said Peter and Margarett fifty Pounds Paper Currency and therefore suit is Brought & Soforth J Chase for the Plaintiff ??????? and the said George Keeth by J Hall his Attorney Comes and Defends the force and Injury or harm and Prays hence thereof to Impart here untill the next Court to be Holden at Charles Town the Second Tuesday in August next and he Hath it and the same day is Given to the said Peter & Margaret here &c at which day to wit the second Tuesday in August afsd Comes as well the said Peter and Margarett as the said George by his Attorney and the said George by his said Attorney Prays Further Leave (?) thereof to Imparte here untill the next County Court to be Holden at Charles Town on the Second Tuesday in November and he Hath it and the same day is given to the Same Peter and Margarett here |
||||||||||||||||||
| 205 |
at which day to wit the Second
Tuesday in November Comes as well the said Peter and Margarett by their Attorney afsd as the said George by his Attorney afsd and the said George by his Said Attorney Prays Further License thereof to Impart here untill the next County Court to be Holden at Charles Town on the Second Tuesday in March next and he Hath it and the same day is Given to the said Peter and Margarett here &c at which day to with the Second Tuesday in March afsd Comes as well the said Peter and Margarett by their Attorney afsd as the said George by his Attorney afsd and the said George by his said Attorney Prays Further License thereof to Impart here untill the next County Court to be holden at Charles Town on the Second Tuesday in June next and he Hath it and the same Day is given to the said Peter & Margarett her &c and now here at this day to with the Second Tuesday in June afsd Comes here the Parties afsd by their attorneys afsd and do agree and Submitt the whole matter in Variance to be Determined by Allen Davis and Thomas Smoot Referees by the Court hereof the Consent of the Partyes afsd Especially appointed whereupon it is said to the said Allan Davies & Thomas Smoot that they have the whole matter in Veriance between the Parties afsd before the Court Here &c and afterwards to wit the same Second Tuesday in June afsd Comes the said Allan Davies & Thos Smoot Referees afsd who Returns to the Court the Following award Viz Charles County &c ????????? do agree that the Plantiff Pay the Defendant his Costs Witness our hands this 26 Day of January. Allan Davis Thomas Smoot Whereupon the same George Deith Senior by his Attorney afsd Prays Judgment of and upon the Return of the Referees afsd in form afsd found for him to be given therefore it is Considered by the Court here that the Peter and Margarett take nothing for his Writt afsd but that he and his Pledges of Prosecuting be in mercy &c and the said George go hereof without day &c. It is further Considered by the Court here that the said George do Recover against the said Peter and Margarett Costs Two Hundred and Thirteen Pounds of tobacco for his Costs and Charges by him about his defence in his Behalf Sustained to the same george by his Assent by the Court here adjudged According to the form force and Effect of the Statute in those Cases late made and Provided and that the said george have thereof Execution. ___________
and him safe keep so that you have his Body before the Justices the Lord Proprietary of their next County Court to be to be Holden at Charles Town on the Second Tuesday in March next next to answer unto Next to answer Unto the lord Proprietary and george Keeth who as well for the said Lord Proprietary as for himself Prosecutes of a plea that he Render unto them the sum of five Thousand Pounds of Tobacco which to him he own and unjustly Detains from the said Lord Proprietary and the said George as well for the said Lord Proprietary as for himself in this behalf Prosecutes &c and he should have then and there that Writt ?? and the said Peter in his Proper Person Came and defends the force and Injury when &c and Prays further Licence thereof to Impart here until the next |
|||||||||||||||||||
| 206 |
next Court to be holden at
Charles Town on the Second Tuesday in June next and he hath it and the same day is given to the same George Keith and the lord Proprietary here ?? at which day to wit the Second Tuesday in June, afsd Comes as well the said George & the lord Proprietary by their Attorney afsd as the said Peter by his Attorney and the said Peter by his Attorney Prays Further License thereof to Impart him untill the next County Court to be Holden at Charles Town the second Tuesday in August next and he hath it and the same day is given to the same George and the lord Proprietary here &c and now here at this day the Second Tuesday in August afsd Came here as well the said George and the lord Proprietary by their Attorney afsd as the said Peter in his Proper Person afsd Comes here the Parties afsd do agree and Submitt the whole matter in Variance to be Determined by Allan Davis & Thomas Smoot Referees by the Court hereof the Consent of the Parties afsd Especially appointed Whereupon it is said to the said Allan Davis & Thomas Smoot that they the whole matter in Variance between the Parties before the Court here ?? and afterwards to wit the Same Second Tuesday afsd Comes the said allan Davvis and Thomas Smoot Referees afsd who Returns to the Court here the Following award Viz: Charles county for we the subscribers do agree that the Plaintiff Pay the Defendant his Costs Witness our Hands this 26 Day of January 1756 Allan Davis Thomas Smoot Whereupon the same Peter in his Proper Person afsd Prays Judgement of and upon the Return of the Referees in form afsd found for him to be given therefore it is Considered by the Court here the the said Geo. & lord Proprietary take nothing by his writt afsd but that he and his Pledges &c of Prosecuting be in mercy &c and the said Peter go thereof without day &c it is further Considered by the Court here that the said Peter do Recover against the George afsd ?? as afsd to Two Hundred and Thirteen pounds of Tobacco for his Costs and Charges by him about his Defence in his behalf Sustained to the same Peter by his Assent by the Court here adjudged According to the form force and Effect on the Statute in those Cases late mad and Provided and that the said Peter have Execution &c |
|||||||||||||||||||
Return to:
Maryland
Carrico Families ©2007-2008 by Linda Boorom